‹ First  < 2 3 4 5 6 >  Last ›
4 of 10
Illegal Immigration
Posted: 24 July 2013 09:04 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 46 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  962
Joined  2012-10-12

Randall,
I believe it was you who said something like “why don’t you guys get a room?”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2013 11:36 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 47 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  714
Joined  2013-07-13

Yes. I said that to a couple of fellows. Who you talking to?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2013 02:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 48 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

Randall,That’s your way of refuting a story that was on all the major news networks?

Sounds like you’re in denial to me.

So whats your favorite news source?

The White House?

LOL!!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2013 03:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 49 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  714
Joined  2013-07-13

“My way” of whaaaa??
I read the WaPo most days. But, I’m arguing immigrants from personal experience. I sure as hell don’t get my news, about anarchists or anything else, from YooToobs. It’s a social site forchristsakes!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2013 07:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 50 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  281
Joined  2012-10-10

FFS. Okay, Dave, you want a response to your troll post? Here’s a response to your troll post:

1. The “Brown Berets” are a Mexican-American organization in California, making a point that white people in the U.S. are the actual immigrants, since California was owned by Mexico, whose citizens are indigenous to the Americas (unless you go back a few hundred thousand years; they’ve been in the Americas many thousands years longer than white folks have, is the point).

1.a. A smallish organization does not in any way represent all “illegals”, Dave, you moron.

2. Your precious “Mexicans attack fellow student” video was deleted. It appears it was agitprop using an incident at a school where kids wore pro-American t-shirts on Cinco de Mayo specifically to cause a ruckus, and were sent home to change. Yep, totally proves your point there, Dave.

3. Just more Michelle Malkin agitprop claiming people who want open immigration laws are radical anarchists. If anyone can find an actual fact in there other than “look at the scary brown people with signs” let me know.

4. The Brown Berets again. Asking why they’re carrying the Mexican flag makes me think you don’t know how to Google anything. They are, by the way, protesting a bill that would make it illegal to teach Mexican literature in schools… and you think they’re the enemy. Charming.

5. Okay, this one is funny: Someone named DeathToLiberalism—who is, I’m sure, completely unbiased—made up the term “anarcho-fascism.” Just read the comments on the video if you don’t know why that’s so hilarious.  The news is from the Santa Cruz riot in 2010, where a group broke off from the main May Day celebration and started writing anarchist graffiti and breaking windows. These are crimes and also probably not even remotely effective, though why this group’s actions three years ago which have not been repeated again means all immigrants are out to get Whitey is beyond me.

6. More agitprop, exaggerating the “crime” of raising a Mexican flag in a small town, and an incident that happened seven full years ago.

7. Again, this video has been deleted—did you even check the links before cutting and pasting them from Redstate, Dave? Apparently, the video was about the protests against Arizona’s immigration law, which IIRC has been declared unConstitutional since. Unsurprisingly, Arizona brought out the police to arrest brown people protesting. Articles about the 2010 incident can be found here and here—note that the 2nd article is from FreeRepublic, reporting what Fox News said, and they called it a “small” riot which occurred when some guy showed up to yell at the “illegals” and it made people mad. Sp yeah, even FreeRepublic and Fox say you’re overreacting on this one, Dave. Kudos.

Nothing I’ve seen in these videos indicates they were all from mainstream media sources; they usually weren’t and I had to go look up MSM articles, which astonishingly never said the same thing these amateur videos were claiming happened.

Dave, if you want to believe this garbage because it fits into your Whiteboy Persecution Complex, and if you have no desire or ability to consider these things logically, best of luck to you. But coming to forums and screaming at everyone else for being stupid because they don’t believe the ridiculous, amateur junk you do? Makes you look bad, man. Real bad.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 03:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 51 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

Exclusive: The Truth About ‘La Raza’

Quote:

“Behind the respectable front of the National Council of La Raza lies the
real agenda of the La Raza movement, the agenda that led to those thousands
of illegal immigrants in the streets of American cities, waving Mexican
flags, brazenly defying our laws, and demanding concessions.

Key among the secondary organizations is the radical racist group Movimiento
Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan
(MEChA), one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West.

One of America’s greatest strengths has always been taking in immigrants
from cultures around the world, and assimilating them into our country as
Americans. By being citizens of the U.S. we are Americans first, and only,
in our national loyalties.

This is totally opposed by MEChA for the hordes of illegal immigrants
pouring across our borders, to whom they say:

“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the
notion that we…should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting
pot…Aztlan was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas ... It became
synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from
a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the
Manifest Destiny.” (Statement on University of Oregon MEChA Website, Jan. 3,
2006)

MEChA isn’t at all shy about their goals, or their views of other races.
Their founding principles are contained in these words in “El Plan
Espiritual de Aztlan” (The Spiritual Plan for Aztlan):

“In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud
historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our
territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land
of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their
birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare
that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our
inevitable destiny…. Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water
the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans…. We
are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of
North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a
nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan. For La Raza todo.
Fuera de La Raza nada.”

That closing two-sentence motto is chilling to everyone who values equal
rights for all. It says: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race,
nothing.”


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=13863

 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 03:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 52 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

What the local news media doesn’t show you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8_ScYY__oyk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 03:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 53 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

“Mexico, whose citizens are indigenous to the Americas (unless you go back a few hundred thousand years; they’ve been in the Americas many thousands years longer than white folks have, is the point).”


I believe the Native Americans were here first!


Mexico & The Scalp Industry

Between 1835 and the 1880s, the Mexican authorities paid private armies to
hunt Native Americans, paying per kill and using scalps as receipts. The
practice began when the Mexican government could no longer provide adequate
protection to its citizens from the marauding Apaches and Comanches.

http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/hns/scalpin/oldfolks.html

 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 03:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 54 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

“More agitprop, exaggerating the “crime” of raising a Mexican flag in a small town, and an incident that happened seven full years ago.”


Because it happen seven years ago doesn’t mean it didn’t happen!

American Veteran Removes US Flag from beneath Mexican Flag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ6cCPbA8jo&feature=related

 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 03:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 55 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

Bad link

Use this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXPNWHRBX1U

 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 05:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 56 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  714
Joined  2013-07-13

So, it IS the brown skinned people that are the cob in your fact-factory!  You hate you some Meskins.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2013 07:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 57 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  281
Joined  2012-10-10

One incident seven years ago that has been exaggerated beyond recognition does not a trend make, Dave.

A few years ago I saw the McDonald’s down in Westloop put the Kansas flag above the US flag for weeks before someone complained, and they changed it to three US flags. So you think Westloop McDonald’s is trying to take over the country?

P.S. Figure out what “the Americas” means first and then get back to me on the indigenous peoples of these two continents.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2013 05:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 58 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

What the local news doesn’t show you!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8_ScYY__oyk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2013 05:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 59 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

What’s a “meskin” Randall?


The next time you see one of your Mexican friends,walk up and call them a “Meskin” and after you get out of the hospital,get back to me.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2013 05:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 60 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2013-02-18

“My way” of whaaaa??

“I read the WaPo most days. But, I’m arguing immigrants from personal experience. I sure as hell don’t get my news, about anarchists or anything else, from YooToobs. It’s a social site forchristsakes!”


That’s your problem Randall,you’re talking about “Immigrants” and I’m talking about “Illegal Aliens”

Let me help you and the other bleeding hearts out!

 

Definitions:


Alien, Immigrant, Illegal Alien, Undocumented Immigrant


These related terms are often used in deliberately confusing and conflicting
ways.  Here is a set of definitions that will help you sort out the
difference.

IMMIGRANT:  In popular usage, an “immigrant” is generally understood to be a
person who migrates to another country, usually for permanent residence.
Under this definition, therefore, an “immigrant” is an alien admitted to the
U.S. as a lawful permanent resident.  The emphasis in this definition is
upon the presumptions that (1) the immigrant followed U.S. laws and
procedures in establishing residence in our country; (2) he or she wishes to
reside here permanently; and (3) he or she swears allegiance to our country
or at least solemnly affirms that he/she will observe and respect our laws
and our Constitution.

ALIEN:  By contrast, an “alien” is generally understood to be a foreigner—
a person who comes from a foreign country—who does not owe allegiance to
our country.

ILLEGAL ALIEN:  An “illegal alien” is a foreigner who (1) does not owe
allegiance to our country; and (2) who has violated our laws and customs in
establishing residence in our country.  He or she is therefore a criminal
under applicable U.S. laws.

      The term “illegal alien” is used by U.S. citizens who believe that
non-citizens entering our country must comply with our immigration laws.

      The term “illegal alien” is predicated upon U.S. immigration law
which requires foreigners entering the U.S. to comply with our country’s
rules and laws regarding entry into, and residence within, our country.

UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT:  The term “undocumented immigrant” is an oxymoron
(the parts conflict). An immigrant is synonymous with “permanent legal
resident.” The old term for the document authorizing a permanent legal
resident is “green card.” The term “undocumented” is derived from the
accurate term “undocumented aliens” who are often called “border crossers.”
Proper terms are “illegal alien” or “undocumented alien” but not
“undocumented immigrant.” Although not commonly used, the term “documented
alien” accurately refers to foreign nationals who have an unexpired
non-immigrant visa such as H-1B.

      Most U.S. citizens do not use the term “undocumented immigrant”
and prefer, instead, the more descriptive and accurate term “illegal alien”.

      The term “undocumented immigrant” is used by those who believe in
“open borders”, i.e., non-regulation of foreigners entering into and
assuming residence in the U.S., including even those foreigners who owe
allegiance to a foreign government and/or who may intend harm to the U.S.

 

 

http://www.adversity.net/Terms_Definitions/TERMS/Illegal-Undocumented.htm

 


No charge.

Profile
 
 
   
‹ First  < 2 3 4 5 6 >  Last ›
4 of 10
 
‹‹ What would happen if.....      Rep Jenkins ››

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | The Manhattan Mercury, 318 North 5th Street, Manhattan, Kansas, 66502

Reproduction of any kind is prohibited without written consent.