Why the difference?????
Posted: 09 July 2013 08:01 AM   [ Ignore ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  796
Joined  2012-10-10

Let’s see… Two idiots set a fire in an apartment building.  The fire results in the death of a college student.  Tragic.  One of the arsonists is sentenced to 20 years, the other 30 years.  ConsequencesIs are meted out for a criminal act.

A group of college students vist a strip joint and tank up on alcohol.  A decision is made to drive drunk.  The vehicle crosses the center line and kills two people.  The drunk driver gets 60 days.  And this is justice???

The first case was adjudicated in the federal court system.  The second, allowing a drunk driver to ‘skate’ with relatively minor consequences, was adjudicated in the District Court by the Governor’s college roomy.  Was pressure applied by the alcohol lobby to go easy on the drunk driver?  Were local interests fearful a harsh sentence for drunk driving might curtail the dollars generated by events like Faux Pattys Day?  Did the court system think a college student’s life “more worthwhile” than two blue-collar people from Ogden?  Was the vast difference in sentences simply one judge vs. another judge? 

How do we ask the younger generation to respect the court system, when such inequities in sentencing is allowed to happen?  How do we teach the younger generation that there can be consequences for making poor choices when the life and safety of others are at stake? 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 July 2013 09:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  962
Joined  2012-10-12

Larry,
While I generally agree with your sentiments, there is a slight difference.  In this case, the main villain had been involved with crimes before.  This wasn’t his first run-in with the law. In the case of the drunk driver, it was very bad judgment, and irresponsibility.  In the arson case, it was deliberate and planned. I believe there is a difference. I think the drunk driver got off too lightly, however, his offense was not an intentional one. Hopefully he will become a model citizen. He will have to live with this lapse of judgment the rest of his life.  In the arson case, you are dealing with a thug who maliciously took another person’s life…and to divert attention from another crime. I’m sorry, but they are just not comparable cases.

Profile
 
 
   
 

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | The Manhattan Mercury, 318 North 5th Street, Manhattan, Kansas, 66502

Reproduction of any kind is prohibited without written consent.